Tuesday, August 14, 2007

End of the Line! Reflections on 23 Things

I do well with boundaries, so I'll start by answering the provided questions before I go off on rambly tangent of my own.

What were your favorite discoveries or exercises on this learning journey?
I thought that Google Docs, learning about podcasts, and getting familiar with RSS feeds were the three most interesting and useful things I learned from this program. Since I was familiar with about half the technology we explored in this program already, I'm not including anything I understood before, so these would be counted among the best new discoveries I found along my 2.0 Journey.

How has this program assisted or affected your lifelong learning goals?
It taught me that I'm very good at learning things when someone sets timelines and structures for me to follow. When I'm self-learning, I kind of wander around aimlessly and never get anything accomplished, but with a simple set of guidelines, I'm too OCD not to follow them in a timely fashion. Perhaps I should go back and really try to work on that element that I thought would be hardest for me in the beginning: setting goals ahead of time. If I could learn to do it for myself, I'd be a much more efficient learner.

Were there any take-aways or unexpected outcomes from this program that surprised you?
It did expose me to a lot of technology I wasn't familiar with before, and as a librarian, I definitely think it's important to have an idea of what's out there that our patrons might be using. Even if we don't use all of these technologies on a daily basis, we have a duty to know what they are, what they're about, and basically how they work so that we can be useful and current resources for the folks who come into the library.

What could we do differently to improve upon this program’s format or concept?
I don't know if it's possible, but the number of accounts we had to create for this program was a little daunting. Personally, having grown up in the age of the internet, I'm a bit wary about what's out there about me floating around on the net that can be tracked down with people who have a knack for using Google to their advantage. It's hard to keep track of all the places you leave your digital fingerprints when you have a billion accounts all over the place, and I was a little frustrated to have so many logins and pages and registers created that I know I might not ever use again and will just sit there uselessly in cyberspace for someone to stumble upon.

If we offered another discovery program like this in the future, would you again chose to participate?
Sure, if for no other reason than to have someone point out new technologies I might not be aware of but should.

How would you describe your learning experience in a few words or a few sentences, so we can share our successes and promote this program?
For those of us who are already familiar with computers, 23 Things is a great program to turn our basic knowledge into something much more in-depth and useful for our patrons. It's a big internet out there, and even librarians can use a helping hand finding the latest and greatest tools available.

* * *

And now for some personal thoughts...
Throughout the program, I found myself getting kind of grumpy because according to my co-workers, even though I'm young, I'm still an old-fashioned matronly librarian at heart. I've grown up in the technology age, and I like it fine when I need it to do something. However, I do not think that the world should exist solely online. I think there's something to be said for handwritten letters and big, thick leatherbound volumes and music played on vinyl and meeting people the usual way - face-to-face instead of as pixels on a screen. I don't understand why people think that technology should replace the real world. It seems like a dangerous thing we're doing here, replacing everything with its computerized counterpart. I'm all for time-saving tools and technology that does things no human ever could, but when co-workers are emailing back and forth from ten feet away instead of talking, and when I read articles about how we should have "paperless libraries" or see people spending more time and effort (not to mention money) on second lives instead of their first ones...I wonder what all this technology is doing TO us while it's doing things FOR us. Halfway through 23 Things, I found myself despising technology and all the stupid little doohickeys and doodads and trinkets that people make, and I wondered why these people didn't have anything better to do with their time. If I used all the technology we learned about just in this short, by-no-means-inclusive program every day, I would never move out from in front of my computer screen.

Now, I don't mean to sound like a hypocrite. When my internet goes down, I get heart palpitations and start panicking and texting people to let them know why I suddenly disappeared in the middle of a conversation or why I won't be back online for a while. But at the same time, I know when it's time to go lie in my hammock and listen to the waterfall in our pond and daydream for a while. It reminds me of that old saying, "The things you own end up owning you." In this case, the tools we use end up using us. Are we masters of our technological domain or its slaves? It's hard to tell sometimes.

Probably the huge influx of technology every week made me have a bit of a knee-jerk reaction where I wanted to turn off my computer for a week and go live in a cabin a la Walden, but overall, I think we can make good use of technology in libraries and in our lives. As long as I spend more time away from a screen a day than I do in front of it, it's all good.

Thanks, 23 Things, for teaching me new things and also helping to give me a bit of much-needed perspective.

E-Libraries and Downloadable Audio Books

For this exercise, I explored Maryland Overdrive because that's our system and I figured I should be familiar with the one our patrons will be using. I've experimented with MD-O before because patrons were asking questions about the downloadable PDF books - whether they could transfer it to their portable mp3 players, whether they could burn the books onto a CD, whether they could print the PDF books out - and I wanted to be able to answer those questions. I find first-hand experience is the best way to know a product, so I went home and downloaded Christopher Moore's The Stupidest Angel as a PDF to my home computer.

At first, I was excited about how easy it was to download the book and how quickly it was delivered, with no needing to go to the library and hunt down the book and take it home. Just click, wait five seconds, and boom, you've got a book on your computer. The problem came when I began trying to read said conveniently-acquired book. I couldn't stand to read it on the screen. I longed for the feel of a thick book in my hands and the sunshine on the back of my neck while I lounged on my back porch with a glass of tea. Not only that, my eyes hurt after a while, and I couldn't keep up with where I was on the screen. It allowed me to print, but who wants to use up all that ink and paper to print out 200+ pages? In the end, I came to the library and checked out the physical book because I couldn't stand to deal with the online version.

Now, I'm not much of an audio book listener. Usually the only time I bother with audio books is when I'm going on a road trip and need something to keep me awake for seven or eight ours at a stretch rolling down the highway. I think that I could get into the idea of checking out audio books, though, perhaps for afternoons when I want to knit and read at the same time, or when I'm working on a project that won't allow me to have a book in my hands. It's certainly easy enough to download, just like the PDF books, it's convenient and simple to use, and you don't have to worry about overdues because the book simply expires off your hard drive. (Digital library collections are probably a very good idea for those patrons who have a hard time returning their materials on time!)

The only thing I don't understand about the eLibraries is the fact that there are only certain numbers of copies available for download. I understand that this is probably a copyright issue, which is fine, but my technological-friendly brain thinks, "Why should I have to put a hold on a digital edition of something? It's a file; it can be downloaded a billion times - that's the joy of digital copies!" If copyright law is the issue here, that makes perfect sense, but it still seems a little counter-intuitive to me to put a hold on digital material that I know should logically be available at all times to as many patrons as are requesting it.

One more thing I'll note for the record is that the Overdrive people are extremely helpful in terms of customer problems. If you have a patron who is having technical issues with downloading materials, Overdrive is very willing to help solve the problem. Great customer service.

Monday, August 13, 2007

Locating Podcasts

Being the music junkie that I am, I've come in contact with podcasts before, usually in the form of interviews of my favorite musicians or perhaps album commentaries they recorded and released as "exclusive bonus material!!!!" for their website and message board subscribers. However, I didn't realize before now that podcasts are considered an audio or video file that is NOT music. Learn something new every day.

In a way, the websites that allow people to create and upload their own podcasts are much like YouTube, or at least are in the same vein of self-publication on the web. The neat thing is the ability to subscribe to these podcasts; that's definitely new and different from YouTube. It's funny to see all the self-published "radio stations" people have created. For someone with a creative mind, what a fantastic resource this could be. The only problem that presents for the person seeking a podcast is that you have to weed through a lot of less-than-reputable podcasts to find ones that provide you with reliable information. (If you're looking for reliable information, that is. If you just want something entertaining to listen to, then no problem!)

I found the search engines, like Podcast.net and Podcast Alley easy to navigate, although I prefer Podcast Alley just a bit more because of their system of listing search results (nifty drop down information when you click a link) and their easier-to-navigate tags. I found half a dozen kind of cool podcasts, three dealing with library- or book-related subjects, and three dealing with random fun stuff:

KCRW's Bookworm
Uncontrolled Vocabulary
Written Voices

Out of the Past: Investigating Film Noir
KneeJerk Radio
Brain Food

I subscribed to KneeJerk Radio on my Bloglines account (the Bloglines account that never gets used, I should add...), and I was pleasantly surprised at how the podcast search engines just give you the address for the RSS Feed so you can pop it right into your Bloglines account. It's a happy shock when websites work together so well.

Overall, I think podcasts are kind of cool, and I think mainly it would be a great alternative to regular radio. Basically, that's what the podcasts that you subscribe to seem like to me - a radio show that gets delivered to your inbox or wherever. Right now, I tend to use podcasts as a one-shot deal - hunting interviews I want and whatnot, but if I was ever in a position to have a specific time set aside every day to listen to radio-type broadcasts, I'd most likely subscribe to a podcast.

Thursday, August 9, 2007

YouTube

Sometimes I wonder how the world existed before YouTube. I mean, where else could we find great Bollywood videos like this one and funny commercials like this one and wacky and hilarious homemade videos about men's bathroom etiquette like this one? Could you live without seeing videos like this? Yes. Would I want to? No.

I remember when YouTube first started getting really popular. It seemed you couldn't go anywhere without seeing people posting up their favorite videos all over their blogs and websites, and now that it has grown in popularity, the selection has only gotten broader. I particularly love that networks like NBC are getting into the game, uploading their own copyrighted content legally, like this digital short from SNL. (Don't watch that one if you're easily offended!) That's the sign of a hip network right there. Also worth note is the fact that YouTube doesn't charge anything and allows the average user to upload anything they want. It's easy and fun and all-around spiffy.

Obviously, I'm the geek who loves YouTube for the bootleg videos that people shoot at concerts of my favorite musicians and the fact that even if I missed someone performing on late night TV because I had to be at work early the next day, I can just pop over to YouTube and catch the performance the next day. Bliss.

So, in keeping with my predictability of always talking about music, I present you with a list of videos of My Favorite Musicians No One Has Ever Heard Of:

~Neal Casal - "Eddy & Diamonds" Recording Documentary
~Regina Spektor - "Samson" Music Video
~Martha Wainwright - Cover of Leonard Cohen's "Tower of Song" on Letterman
~Teddy Thompson - "Everybody Move It/I Wish It Was Over" on Jools Holland
~And a bonus... OK Go - "Here It Goes Again" The viral music video that took YouTube by storm and made this band famous.

YouTube makes me happy.

Wednesday, August 8, 2007

Web 2.0 Winner

Okay, I hope it's not cheating for me to write about a site I was already familiar with, but I was so surprised and pleased when I clicked on the winners list of the Web 2.0 awards to find that one of my favorite sites, Pandora, won top honors for the music category!!

It totally deserves it. The site originally started as the Human Genome Project, and after they realized their classification system of music could be turned pretty easily into a predicter of musical tastes, Pandora was born.

The best thing about Pandora is that it helps you discover new music you might not have otherwise known about. The more you use it, the more "intelligent" it gets at predicting your tastes. It's kind of like having a personal music advisor right in your computer, and you can tap into it any time. By a system of 'thumbs up' and 'thumbs down' approvals, you can either accept or reject their suggestions of music you might like, and if you say you really hate something, they'll never play it again.

Sites like this are in danger because legislation is being pushed to start taxing streaming music sites, and a lot of these online resources are run by small companies with no more than a half a dozen people, start-ups who had a great idea and took advantage of the World Wide Web to get a business started. It would be a shame to see resources such as these go out of business because they crack under heavy taxation.

Pandora is user-friendly, aesthetically pleasing, and serves a great purpose for those of us who are always looking for that next new artist to try out. Getting to play around with it at work was a joy; almost as much fun as playing around with it at home.

Google Docs

Woooow. Okay, for the first time since I started doing 23 Things, I've discovered a technology I was unaware of before that I think is totally and completely fantastic! The ability to word process online, ooh! No more copyrighted software that you try to update over and over again as the years go by, taking up room on your hard drive and driving you crazy when you get a new computer and have to suffer through the reinstallation process! Google owns my heart, truly.

I already used gmail before I created my blogger blog because I think the service is streamline, easy to use, and incredibly efficient and useful - not a lot of extra stuff cluttering up the place. I find that Google Docs & Spreadsheets is much the same! Clear, easy-to-understand layout, not a lot of clutter. In short, it's exactly what you need without a bunch of crap you don't. Once again, the Google empire has won over my heart.

P.S. And it actually posted properly to my blog! Yippee!

Thursday, August 2, 2007

Sandbox Wiki

This was an interesting activity. I expected the sandbox to be more organized and less chaotic, but then, it is a playspace, and there are a ton of beginners (including myself) poking around in there, so no big deal.

I think that I'm so unused to communal webpages that I tended to use it more like a message board than a website editor. I wanted to sign my additions (and did) because you can't tell who added what, and it felt strange and wrong to edit someone else's webpage. I know this isn't an uncommon feeling - after all, as the last activity said, we're very picky about our personal space! I kept thinking...what if I change something that the original person doesn't like? How will anyone know which are my contributions and which were already there? Maybe if I could get used to and start to enjoy the idea of anonymously adding content, I could get into it more. Actually, I think that's pretty much required in order to use wikis a lot - that's the whole point! Maybe I'm too much of a control freak for the concept not to make me twitch a little bit around the eye.

In any case, I thought it was fairly easy to use, but as someone who actually knows a bit of html, I found it annoying that I couldn't use my coding but had to rely on their WYSIWYG buttons. Since it's a bulletin board, it also uses that odd alternate html with brackets instead of carats (carrots? carets?), which may or may not be called CSS? I'm not sure. I don't really know anything but basic html, and I definitely don't know CSS. But I added my contributions nonetheless. I edited the blog page, the What I Am Reading page, and the Rather Be Knitting page.

Kinda fun, not too difficult.